1Jan

Dell Dell P2415q Screen Driver For Mac

Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Dell Ultra HD 4K Monitor P2415Q 24-Inch Screen LED-Lit Monitor at Amazon.com. Dell Ultra HD 4K Monitor P2415Q 24-Inch Screen LED-Lit Monitor. Maybe I had some residual drivers installed interfering with it. All in all extraordinary purchase and service experience.

Posted 2015-03-22 A year and a half ago, in my, I wrote: ❝although it's great to be able to hook up two external displays, it's not so great to have to choose between the small, but high resolution internal display and the big, but low resolution external displays. I find myself working on the internal display a lot, but when I need more screen real estate I switch to the big external display.

I sit relatively far from my external display, so the fuzzy pixels aren't too obvious. The high resolution display hasn't completely ruined regular displays for me, but it's certainly got me coveting an external 4k display.❞ 4k displays have gotten pretty affordable now, do I decided to get one. I went for the Dell P2415Q, which I got for a little under 400 euros. However, it was on backorder everywhere when I ordered it and it took six weeks to get here. Perhaps Dell is discontinuing this display? Anyway, it's a 3840x2160 display. It's 52.7 by 29.6 cm (60.5 cm diagonal), or 20.8 by 11.7 inches (23.8' diagonal).

(There's also a very similar 68.5 cm / 27 in model.) That's only a hair larger than the Dell U2312HM monitor I've been using since 2011. The P2415Q has double the pixels in each direction as the U2312HM, so in HiDPI mode, the usable screen resolution is the same: 1920x1080 'points'. That's a lot more than what I get on the internal display of my MacBook Pro, which is 33.8 cm (13.3'), with a resolution of 2560x1600 pixels and a cramped 1280x800 points. The MBP's internal screen has 9 pixels per mm (227 pixels per inch), the P2415Q 7.3 px/mm (185 px/in). This means that you can sit 22% further back and get the same apparent size of stuff on the screen, which is not a bad thing for aging eyes.

3840x2160 is twice as many pixels as the 2560x1600 of the internal screen, and four times as many as a 1920x1080 HDTV resolution screen. And unfortunately, the 2013 13' MacBook Pro simply can't push that many pixels out at the regular framerate of 60 Hz: you have to run a 4k screen at 30 Hz. () I was a bit worried about this, as it makes any movement on the screen, such as scrolling, much choppier. In practice, it hasn't been a big deal so far. Yes, scrolling Safari windows is a bit choppier, but it's not like that's always silky smooth at 60 Hz, and also not exactly a huge deal anyway. But for things like gaming and video, this can be more annoying and even potentially be a deal breaker. Note that 30 Hz means the Mac updates the screen 30 times per second, but between those updates the screen doesn't flicker, so for non-moving content 30 vs 60 Hz doesn't make any difference.

But I'm getting ahead of myself. After setting up the display and hooking it up to the Mac using the supplied miniDisplayPort-to-DisplayPort cable, the screen came on at 2560x1440 at 60 Hz. Which certainly isn't terrible, but not as nice as the native 4k in HiDPI (pixel doubling) mode. The Mac didn't have any options to change to 4k resolution.

Mac high sierra update problems. However, out of the box, the DisplayPort option isn't turned on. After enabling MST and setting the screen up as the primary, the only thing I got was a black screen.

Unfortunately, making any changes was impossible at this point, because the menu doesn't come on if there's no valid DisplayPort signal and the option is grayed out when using the HDMI port. However, after half a minute or so the display said there was no signal, and asked if I wanted to switch to secondary mode. I did, and after that the screen came on in 3840x2160 mode at 30 Hz. The Mac offers the following resolutions: I'm not sure what the deal is with only recognizing the display's resolution with MST turned on and then addressing it as a secondary display. The P2415Q has a DisplayPort and a miniDisplayPort input and an HDMI input—but no VGA.

It also has a DisplayPort output, which allows you to daisy chain a second display. So I hooked up my U2312HM to the P2415Q, hoping that I'd be able to use both screens using a single port on my computer. But that didn't work—the Mac doesn't recognize the second display. However, the P2415Q does forward the signal to the U2312HM, so when using a resolution that the U2312HM supports, both screens will show the same image. However, the MacBook Pro can drive two external displays using its two miniDisplayPort/thunderbolt ports and HDMI port: I mirrored all the displays, optimizing for the P2415Q's resolution. You can of course also use each screen independently, or close the lid of the laptop and only use one or both external displays.